Alvarado Score

MANTRELS — Clinical Probability of Acute Appendicitis

A 10-point clinical scoring system (Migration, Anorexia, Nausea, Tenderness, Rebound, Elevated temperature, Leukocytosis, Left shift) to estimate the probability of acute appendicitis before imaging.

General SurgeryAcute AbdomenAppendicitis
Alvarado Score (MANTRELS)
Tick criteria above

Interpretation

ScoreProbabilityRecommended Action
0–4Low — appendicitis unlikelyDischarge with return precautions; avoid unnecessary CT in children
5–6Equivocal — possible appendicitisImaging (ultrasound ± CT); active observation; surgical review
7–8High — probable appendicitisSurgical review; proceed to imaging or direct theatre depending on clinical picture
9–10Very high — likely appendicitisPrompt surgical intervention; imaging may not be required if clinical picture is clear

Clinical Application

The Alvarado Score is the most widely validated clinical scoring tool for acute appendicitis. It can reduce negative appendicectomy rates and guide imaging decisions, particularly in resource-limited settings where CT is not immediately available.

  • Score ≤4: Negative predictive value ~95% for appendicitis. Safe to discharge most adult patients with close follow-up instructions.
  • Score 5–6: Diagnostic uncertainty zone. Ultrasound first (avoids radiation), then CT if equivocal — standard approach per WSES and SSAT guidelines.
  • Score ≥7 in adults: Many surgeons proceed directly to theatre or use CT only to exclude a perforation.
  • Children and women of childbearing age: Alvarado may be less specific. Ultrasound is preferred first-line imaging; MRI if ultrasound inconclusive.
  • Can be used alongside the AIR Score and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) for additional discrimination in intermediate-risk cases.

Evidence & Validation

Derived by Alvarado in 1986 from 305 adult patients. Validated extensively in diverse populations (meta-analysis by Ohle et al. 2011: 42 studies, n=14,397, AUC 0.83–0.90). Sensitivity for scores ≥7 is approximately 82–85%, specificity 81–92%. The score performs equally in developed and resource-limited healthcare settings.

Limitations

  • Lower sensitivity in children (score <7 does not reliably exclude appendicitis in paediatric populations)
  • Lower specificity in women of childbearing age due to gynaecological causes mimicking appendicitis
  • Cannot distinguish simple from gangrenous/perforated appendicitis
  • WBC and differential results are needed, making it not entirely "bedside"
  • CRP, which improves diagnosis in combination, is not included in the original Alvarado score

References

  1. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557–564.
  2. Ohle R, et al. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:139.
  3. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27.
  4. Di Saverio S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):27.

Related Calculators