SOFT Score

Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation
Predicts the probability of 3-month graft survival based on recipient characteristics at the time of transplantation. Developed from UNOS registry data; helps identify high-risk recipients who may not benefit from marginal grafts.
Liver Transplantation Graft Survival Recipient Risk Hepatology
SOFT Score Calculator

SOFT Score Variables

VariableCategoryPoints
Recipient Age18–40 years0
41–50 years2
51–60 years4
61–70 years6
>70 years8
(Scored continuously by decade)
Prior abdominal surgeryYes1
Diabetes mellitusYes2
Hospitalised at transplantYes2
Life support (ICU/ventilator)Yes5
Dialysis within 2 weeksYes3
Previous liver transplantYes4
Cause of liver failureAcute liver failure3
Other (ALD/HCV/NASH/HCC)0
MELD Score6–110
12–172
18–234
24–296
30–358
36–41 / >4110 / 12

P-SOFT (Predictive SOFT)

P-SOFT adds donor-related factors to the recipient-based SOFT score, enabling a combined donor-recipient risk assessment before organ acceptance:

Donor FactorCategoryAdditional Points
Cold Ischaemia Time<12 hours0
12–24 hours+3
>24 hours+6
Donor Age<40 years0
40–59 years+2
≥60 years+4

P-SOFT = SOFT + CIT points + Donor Age points. P-SOFT is used when the graft has been offered and donor details are known; it provides a combined estimate of outcome probability.

Interpretation

SOFT ScoreRisk3-Month Graft SurvivalGuidance
≤20Good prognosis>80%Suitable for most graft offers including marginal donors
21–30Moderate risk70–80%Caution with marginal grafts; consider DRI/ET-DRI of specific offer
≥31Poor prognosis<70%Decline marginal graft — accept only ideal standard criteria donors

Clinical Application

  • SOFT score focuses solely on recipient factors — ideal for deciding how much donor risk can be accepted for a given recipient prior to knowing which specific graft is available
  • Patients with SOFT ≥31 should receive the lowest-risk available graft; marginal or extended criteria donors should be declined regardless of urgency
  • Life support (SOFT +5) and acute liver failure (SOFT +3) are the highest-weighted individual recipient risk factors
  • MELD ≥36 adds 10–12 points to SOFT, making MELD the dominant continuous contributor in critically ill patients
  • Used in conjunction with BAR score (donor + recipient combined) and DRI (donor only) for complete donor-recipient matching analysis
  • The original SOFT derivation used 3-month graft survival as the endpoint — not 1-year survival — reflecting the critical early post-transplant period

References

  1. Rana A, et al. Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(12):2537–2546.

Related Calculators